Medical malpractice can occur in any healthcare setting, from hospitals to clinics to private practices. When a patient is injured due to medical negligence, they may have the option to file a personal injury claim and receive compensation for their damages. However, in order to do so, they must meet the burden of proof in their case.
Table of Contents
What is the Burden of Proof?
In any legal case, the burden of proof refers to the responsibility of the plaintiff (the person bringing the lawsuit) to prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt. This means that they must present evidence that is persuasive enough to convince a judge or jury that the defendant (the person being sued) is responsible for the damages.
Burden of Proof in Medical Malpractice Cases
Medical malpractice cases must meet a higher burden of proof than other personal injury cases. This is because healthcare providers are held to a higher standard of care than the average person, due to their training and expertise.
In a medical malpractice case, the plaintiff must prove the following:
- The healthcare provider had a duty of care to the patient
- The healthcare provider breached that duty of care by providing substandard medical treatment
- The breach of duty caused the patient’s injury or damages
- The patient suffered harm or damages as a result of the healthcare provider’s breach of duty
Proving Breach of Duty
One of the main challenges in a medical malpractice case is proving that the healthcare provider breached their duty of care. This requires showing that another healthcare provider, with the same training and experience, would not have made the same mistake or provided the same level of care.
To prove breach of duty, the plaintiff must usually rely on expert testimony from other healthcare providers. These experts can provide opinions on whether the healthcare provider in question provided substandard care, based on their knowledge and experience in the field.
Causation
In addition to proving breach of duty, the plaintiff must also show that the healthcare provider’s breach of duty caused their injury or damages. This means that if the patient would have suffered harm even if the healthcare provider had not made a mistake, the provider may not be held liable.
In some cases, causation can be difficult to prove. For example, if a patient already had a pre-existing condition that was exacerbated by medical treatment, it may be difficult to show that the medical provider was responsible for the harm.
Compensation for Damages
If the plaintiff is successful in proving their case, they may be entitled to compensation for their damages. This can include medical bills, lost wages, pain and suffering, and other economic and non-economic losses.
Conclusion
Medical malpractice personal injury cases can be complex and challenging, but with the help of experienced legal counsel and expert witnesses, plaintiffs may be able to meet the burden of proof and receive compensation for their damages. If you believe that you have been injured due to medical negligence, contact a personal injury attorney to discuss your legal options.