Being bitten by a dog can be a traumatic experience, often leading to extensive medical treatment, rehabilitation, and time away from work. If you have suffered a dog bite injury, you may be entitled to compensation for your damages, including medical bills, lost income, pain and suffering, and more.
Before pursuing a dog bite injury lawsuit, it is important to understand your legal options and the potential outcomes of a settlement or a trial. Each option has its own advantages and disadvantages, and the decision ultimately depends on the specific circumstances of your case.
Table of Contents
Settlement
A settlement occurs when the dog owner or their insurance company agrees to pay a certain amount of money to the victim in exchange for dropping the lawsuit. Settlement negotiations can take place before or after a lawsuit is filed, with the help of an attorney.
Advantages of Settlement
Quicker Resolution
One of the primary advantages of settling a dog bite injury lawsuit is that it can be resolved much quicker than going to trial. Trials can take months or even years to reach a conclusion, while settlement negotiations can often be completed within a matter of weeks or months.
Lower Legal Fees
Settlements often result in lower legal fees than a trial. Trials require extensive preparation, including depositions, witness interviews, expert testimony, and more. These costs can add up quickly, making a trial significantly more expensive than a settlement.
Certainty of Outcome
Another benefit of settling a case is that you have certainty of the outcome. By agreeing to a settlement, you know exactly how much money you will receive and when you will receive it. Trials, on the other hand, are often unpredictable and can result in a wide range of outcomes.
Disadvantages of Settlement
Lower Compensation
One of the main drawbacks of settling a dog bite injury lawsuit is that the compensation you receive may be lower than what you would receive at trial. Insurance companies often offer low settlement amounts in the hopes of avoiding a trial and saving money.
No Public Recognition
Another disadvantage of settling is that there is no public recognition of your case. Trials are often covered by the media, which can bring attention to your case and the issue of dog bites. Settlements, on the other hand, usually occur behind closed doors and may not receive any public attention.
Trial
If a settlement cannot be reached, a trial may be necessary to resolve the case. Trials can be lengthy and complex, requiring extensive preparation and the presentation of evidence to a judge and/or jury.
Advantages of Trial
Higher Compensation
One of the main advantages of going to trial is the potential for higher compensation. Juries and judges often award larger payouts than insurance companies are willing to settle for, resulting in a higher compensation for the victim.
Public Recognition
Another benefit of going to trial is the potential for public recognition of your case. Trials may be covered by the media, bringing attention to the issue of dog bites and potentially preventing future incidents.
Disadvantages of Trial
Longer Process
One of the main drawbacks of going to trial is the longer process. Trials can take months or even years to reach a conclusion, with multiple court appearances, motions, and other legal procedures.
Uncertainty of Outcome
Trials are often unpredictable, with a wide range of possible outcomes. While the potential for higher compensation exists, there is also a possibility that the victim may receive no compensation at all.
Conclusion
Deciding whether to settle or go to trial for a dog bite injury lawsuit depends on the specific circumstances of each case. Settlements offer a quicker resolution and lower legal fees, but may result in lower compensation and no public recognition. Trials offer the potential for higher compensation and public recognition, but can be lengthy and unpredictable. Consulting with a knowledgeable and experienced dog bite injury attorney can help victims make an informed decision about which option is best for their case.