Personal injury cases can be quite complex and time-consuming. Aside from the physical and emotional toll that such cases can take on the parties involved, the legal process can be overwhelming, tedious, and costly. In Oklahoma, however, there are alternative methods of resolving personal injury disputes, such as mediation and arbitration. These methods can provide a faster, less stressful, and more cost-effective solution to litigation.
Table of Contents
Mediation
Mediation is a form of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) that involves a neutral third-party mediator who assists the parties in reaching a settlement. Unlike litigation, mediation is a non-adversarial process. The mediator does not make decisions or offer opinions but instead facilitates communication between the parties to help them reach a mutually acceptable solution.
Benefits of Mediation
Cost-Effective
Mediation can be substantially less expensive than litigation. Because mediation is typically faster than litigation, the parties can reduce their costs for legal fees and court costs.
Confidentiality
Mediation is confidential. This means that the parties can discuss the issues freely without fear of disclosure.
Control of the Outcome
Mediation allows the parties to control the outcome of their dispute. Unlike litigation, where a judge or jury makes the final decision, mediation offers the parties the opportunity to craft a settlement that meets their specific needs and interests.
Relationship Preservation
In many personal injury cases, the parties may have ongoing relationships. For example, the accident may have involved family members, friends, or coworkers. Mediation can help preserve these relationships by providing a non-adversarial environment for the parties to negotiate a settlement that is mutually acceptable.
The Mediation Process
The mediation process typically begins with the selection of a mediator. The parties can choose a mediator jointly or through the court or ADR program. Once the mediator is selected, the parties meet to discuss the logistics of the mediation, such as the date, time, and location.
On the day of the mediation, the mediator will meet jointly with the parties to discuss the process and the ground rules for the mediation. The mediator will then meet separately with each party to discuss their concerns and interests. The mediator will work with the parties to identify areas of agreement and disagreement.
Once the parties have identified areas of agreement, the mediator will work with them to create a settlement agreement. If the parties are unable to reach an agreement, they can still proceed to litigation.
Arbitration
Arbitration is another form of ADR that involves the submission of a dispute to a neutral third-party arbitrator who makes a binding decision. Like mediation, arbitration is typically faster and less expensive than traditional litigation.
Benefits of Arbitration
Simplification of the Process
Arbitration can be a simpler process than litigation. Because the rules of evidence and procedure are generally more relaxed in arbitration, the parties can present their cases more informally.
Expedited Process
Arbitration can be a more expedited process than litigation. The arbitrator’s decision is typically issued within weeks or a few months, rather than the years it often takes for a case to be resolved in court.
Expertise of Decision-Makers
The arbitrator is typically an expert in the relevant area of law or industry. This can be an advantage, as the arbitrator can provide a decision based on a deep understanding of the issues involved.
The Arbitration Process
The arbitration process typically begins with the selection of the arbitrator. Like mediation, the parties can select an arbitrator jointly or through the court or ADR program. Once the arbitrator is selected, the parties submit their evidence and arguments in a hearing, which is similar to a trial. The arbitrator then issues a decision, which is binding.
Conclusion
Mediation and arbitration are effective options for resolving personal injury disputes in Oklahoma. By avoiding traditional litigation, parties can save time, money, and stress while still reaching a favorable outcome. As such, plaintiffs and defendants should consider whether ADR is right for their case.