Exploring The Difference Between Negligence And Intentional Harm In Hawaii

When it comes to determining legal culpability in Hawaii, a crucial factor is whether harm was inflicted intentionally or through negligence. This distinction can be the deciding factor in whether a plaintiff is entitled to compensation or criminal charges are brought against the defendant. In this article, we will explore the definitions of negligence and intentional harm as they apply in Hawaii’s legal system.

Negligence

Negligence is a failure to take reasonable care to avoid causing harm to another person. In Hawaii, negligence is defined as "the failure to exercise that degree of care which a reasonable and prudent person would exercise under similar circumstances." Essentially, this means that if someone acts in a way that a reasonable person would not, and that action causes harm to someone else, they may be considered negligent.

Elements of Negligence

There are four elements that must be present for negligence to be established in Hawaii:

Duty

The first element is the existence of a duty of care. This means that the defendant had a legal obligation to take reasonable care not to cause harm to the plaintiff. For example, a doctor has a duty of care to their patients, while a driver has a duty of care to other drivers on the road.

Breach

The second element is a breach of that duty. This occurs when the defendant fails to exercise reasonable care, as defined by the standard of care in their profession or situation.

Causation

The third element is causation. This means that the defendant’s breach of duty must have directly caused the harm suffered by the plaintiff. In other words, the plaintiff must prove that the harm would not have occurred if the defendant had acted with reasonable care.

Damages

The final element is damages. The plaintiff must have suffered some harm or injury as a result of the defendant’s breach of duty.

Examples of Negligence

A common example of negligence in Hawaii would be a car accident caused by a driver who was distracted by their cellphone. This driver had a duty of care to other drivers on the road, breached that duty by using their phone, directly caused the accident, and caused damages to the other driver’s car and potentially physical injuries as well.

Intentional Harm

Intentional harm, on the other hand, occurs when someone deliberately causes harm to another person. This includes actions like assault, battery, and defamation. In Hawaii, intentional harm is defined as an act that is "done with intent to harm another or with knowledge that the act will result in harm to that person."

Elements of Intentional Harm

There are three elements that must be present for intentional harm to be established in Hawaii:

Intent

The first element is intent. The defendant must have acted with the purpose of causing harm to the plaintiff or with the knowledge that their actions would result in harm.

Harm

The second element is harm. The plaintiff must have suffered some kind of injury or damage as a result of the defendant’s actions.

Causation

The third element is causation. The defendant’s actions must have directly caused the harm suffered by the plaintiff.

Examples of Intentional Harm

An example of intentional harm in Hawaii would be a physical altercation in which one person hits another person with a weapon. The defendant in this case had the intent to harm the victim, directly caused harm through the use of a weapon, and caused damages to the victim’s body.

Conclusion

Understanding the difference between negligence and intentional harm is crucial in Hawaii’s legal system. Negligence refers to a failure to take reasonable care, while intentional harm refers to a deliberate act of causing harm. Whether harm was inflicted intentionally or through negligence can be the deciding factor in legal proceedings. By knowing the definitions and elements of each, individuals can better understand their rights and responsibilities in legal matters.

Scroll to Top