Personal injury cases involve individuals who have suffered injuries due to the negligent behavior of another party. In Alaska, personal injury cases can include car accidents, slip and fall incidents, medical malpractice, and more. However, accidents can often be the result of the actions of two or more parties. In these cases, the court takes into consideration the concept of comparative fault to determine the level of responsibility each party bears for the accident.
Table of Contents
Defining Comparative Fault
Comparative fault is a concept used in personal injury cases when more than one party is at fault for an accident. The court will determine each party’s percentage of fault for the accident. The damages awarded to the plaintiff are then reduced by the percentage of fault they hold for the incident.
Modified Comparative Fault in Alaska
Alaska follows a modified comparative fault system, which means that a plaintiff can only recover damages from the defendant if their percentage of fault is less than 51%. In other words, if the plaintiff is more than 50% responsible for the accident, they cannot recover damages from the defendant.
For example, if a driver is injured in a car accident and is found to be 40% responsible for the accident, they can still recover 60% of the damages from the defendant. However, if the driver is found to be 60% responsible, they cannot recover any damages from the defendant.
Factors Considered in Determining Comparative Fault
Alaska courts consider several factors in determining each party’s percentage of fault for the accident. These factors include:
- The actions of each party leading up to the accident
- Whether one party had a legal duty to prevent the accident
- The extent to which each party acted negligently
- The severity of the injuries sustained
- Any other relevant factors
Example: Slip and Fall Case
To understand how comparative fault works in practice, let’s consider an example. Imagine a customer slips and falls in a grocery store due to a wet floor. The customer suffers injuries and sues the grocery store for damages.
However, during the trial, the court finds that the customer was on their phone and not watching where they were going at the time of the accident. The court also finds that the grocery store had not noticed the wet floor yet but had been cleaning the area immediately before the accident. In this case, the court may determine that the customer was 30% responsible for the accident due to their distracted behavior.
The damages awarded to the customer would then be reduced by 30% due to their comparative fault, and the grocery store would only be responsible for paying 70% of the total damages.
Importance of Seeking Legal Advice
In personal injury cases, determining comparative fault can be complicated and requires a thorough examination of all evidence related to the accident. As such, it’s important to secure the services of an experienced personal injury attorney who can navigate the legal system and fight for your rights.
In Alaska, the statute of limitations for personal injury cases is two years from the date of the accident. Therefore, it’s important to contact an attorney as soon as possible to ensure your case is filed within the appropriate time frame.
Final Thoughts
Comparative fault is an essential factor in determining the damages awarded in personal injury cases in Alaska. By understanding how comparative fault works and the factors used to determine each party’s percentage of fault, you can protect your rights and ensure you receive fair compensation for your injuries. To get the legal assistance you need to navigate the personal injury claims process, contact an experienced attorney today.